6 Best InVision Alternatives in 2026 (InVision Is Shutting Down — Where to Go)
InVision has ended its Free and Starter plans and is winding down. Here are the best InVision alternatives for product designers and teams who need to migrate their prototypes and design workflows.
Disclosure: This article contains affiliate links. We may earn a commission if you sign up through one of our links, at no extra cost to you.
TL;DR: Figma is the best InVision replacement — it covers prototype sharing, design review, and collaborative editing in one tool. Penpot if you want free and open source. Marvel for simple prototype-only workflows without adopting a full design tool. Miro if your primary InVision use was Freehand whiteboards. Framer if your output is websites.
InVision Is Winding Down — What That Means
InVision was the dominant prototype sharing and design review platform from roughly 2012 to 2019. It solved a real problem: sharing clickable mockups with stakeholders without requiring them to install software or have design tool access. The product category it created — prototype sharing with comment threads and approval workflows — was genuinely novel.
The platform struggled as Figma expanded to cover prototyping and design review natively. When Figma’s share link enabled stakeholder review without Figma accounts, InVision’s core value proposition became redundant for teams already using Figma.
InVision’s decline was fast:
- 2022–2023: Multiple rounds of layoffs, product development slows
- 2023: Free and Starter plans ended, existing users forced to enterprise plans or off the platform
- 2024–2026: InVision in effective maintenance mode — existing enterprise contracts honored, no new development
The migration imperative: teams still on InVision are running on a platform with no future development, dwindling support, and an uncertain shutdown timeline. The right move is migration, not waiting.
What teams are actually migrating away from varies:
- InVision prototype sharing (hotspot-based click-through prototypes, stakeholder review, comment threads)
- InVision Studio (the attempt at a full design tool — largely abandoned)
- InVision Freehand (the whiteboard/collaboration product)
- Design System Manager (DSM) (InVision’s design token and system management tool)
Different alternatives fit each use case.
InVision Alternatives at a Glance
| Tool | Prototype sharing | Collaborative design | Whiteboard | Free tier | Pricing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Figma | Yes (Prototype mode) | Yes | FigJam | Yes (3 projects) | $12/editor/mo |
| Penpot | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Free / $17/mo |
| Framer | Yes (live sites) | Yes | No | Yes (subdomain) | $5–30/mo |
| Marvel | Yes | Basic | No | Yes (1 project) | $12/user/mo |
| Miro | No (whiteboard only) | No | Yes | Yes | $8/user/mo |
| Zeplin | Handoff only | No | No | Yes (1 project) | $6/user/mo |
Figma — The Complete InVision Replacement
Figma is the most natural InVision replacement because it does everything InVision did and more — in one integrated tool. Teams that migrated from InVision to Figma didn’t just replace prototype sharing; they consolidated their entire design workflow into one platform.
How Figma replaces InVision’s specific features:
InVision prototype screens → Figma Prototype mode: Figma’s Prototype mode lets you link frames with hotspots and transitions. Sharing a prototype link generates a URL that stakeholders open in a browser — no account required to view and comment. The UX for stakeholder review is comparable to InVision’s.
InVision comment threads → Figma comments: Design file comments in Figma let reviewers annotate specific elements. Prototype mode comments let testers annotate on prototype flows. The workflow matches InVision’s review-and-feedback loop.
InVision DSM → Figma Variables and Libraries: Figma’s design token system (Variables) and shared Team Libraries cover InVision DSM’s role in managing design system tokens and distributing them across projects.
InVision Freehand → FigJam: Figma’s whiteboard product (FigJam) is the in-house replacement for InVision Freehand’s collaborative whiteboard functionality. FigJam is free for Figma accounts.
What makes Figma a better choice than InVision was:
- Collaborative design and prototype review in one tool — no separate tool for design, separate tool for sharing
- Active development — Figma ships regularly, InVision is frozen
- Industry-standard skill — designers you hire will expect Figma, not InVision
- Real-time multiplayer design editing, which InVision Studio never delivered properly
Figma pricing:
- Free: 3 projects, 3 editors, 30-day version history
- Professional: $12/editor/month (annual) — unlimited files, team libraries
- Organization: $45/editor/month (annual) — SSO, org-wide libraries, advanced admin
- Enterprise: $75/editor/month
- Developer Mode: $25/developer/month
Migration path from InVision: If your source designs were in Sketch, import them to Figma first, then rebuild prototype hotspot connections in Figma’s Prototype panel. If your designs were in Photoshop or as image files, you’ll need to recreate them in Figma from scratch (which is usually the right call anyway — image-file-based prototyping was always fragile).
Verdict: Figma is the right choice for the overwhelming majority of InVision migrations. It’s where the industry moved, where your new hires expect to work, and where active development is happening.
Penpot — Best Free InVision Alternative
For teams that need the full collaborative design-and-prototype workflow that InVision covered (via InVision’s integrations with Sketch), but don’t want to pay Figma’s per-seat pricing, Penpot is the most capable free option.
Penpot includes design, prototyping, and developer handoff in one browser-based tool, with real-time collaboration — all free for teams up to 5 editors on the cloud tier, and fully free when self-hosted.
What Penpot covers from InVision’s workflow:
- Prototype flows with screen-to-screen hotspot linking
- Stakeholder sharing via public prototype links
- Comment and annotation system for review
- Developer handoff with CSS exports
Penpot pricing:
- Cloud Free: up to 5 editors, unlimited files, prototyping included
- Starter: $7/editor/month
- Professional: $17/editor/month — SSO, advanced permissions
- Self-hosted: free
Verdict: Penpot is the right InVision alternative for teams that need to eliminate per-seat costs. The free cloud tier covers the core collaborative design and prototype workflow that replaced InVision’s value proposition.
Marvel — Closest to InVision’s Original Prototype Sharing
Marvel’s product philosophy is closest to what InVision originally was: a tool for building click-through prototypes from design assets and sharing them for review. If your team’s InVision use was primarily “upload screens, add hotspots, share a link with stakeholders” — and you don’t want to adopt a full design environment like Figma — Marvel is the most direct replacement.
What Marvel does well:
- Import screens from Figma, Sketch, or as image files — hotspot-based prototype flows without redesigning anything
- Clean stakeholder sharing with a view-only browser link
- Comment and feedback system on shared prototypes
- Handoff mode: CSS properties and measurements for developers
- Basic user testing: record sessions of testers navigating prototypes
Marvel pricing:
- Free: 1 project, unlimited collaborators (view + comment)
- Pro: $12/user/month — unlimited projects, version history, handoff, user testing
- Enterprise: custom pricing
Migration path from InVision: Export your InVision screens as image files (PNG/JPG), import into Marvel, rebuild hotspot connections. InVision’s JSON prototype export may work with third-party converters, but image-based migration is simpler.
Verdict: Marvel is the right choice for teams whose InVision use was purely prototype sharing and stakeholder review — not collaborative design. If you design in Figma or Sketch and only used InVision for the sharing layer, Marvel is a direct, lower-friction replacement.
Miro — Best Replacement for InVision Freehand
InVision Freehand was a collaborative whiteboard and visual collaboration product — separate from InVision’s prototype sharing. Teams that used Freehand for design sprints, customer journey mapping, ideation sessions, and cross-functional workshops need a different replacement than teams that used InVision’s prototype tool.
Miro is the most feature-complete Freehand replacement. It’s a dedicated collaborative whiteboard platform with a mature ecosystem of templates for design thinking, product discovery, retrospectives, and workshops.
What Miro does well:
- Infinite canvas with real-time multiplayer — comparable to Freehand’s whiteboard
- Template library: 2,500+ templates for design sprints, user journey maps, wireframing, retrospectives
- Sticky notes, shapes, connectors, and freehand drawing
- Voting, timer, and facilitation tools for structured sessions
- Integration with Figma, Jira, Confluence, and Slack
Miro pricing:
- Free: 3 editable boards, unlimited team members (view only)
- Starter: $8/user/month — unlimited boards, private boards
- Business: $16/user/month — advanced export, SSO, advanced security
Verdict: Miro is the best replacement for InVision Freehand’s whiteboard and visual collaboration features. If your InVision migration is specifically about Freehand, Miro (or FigJam for Figma-integrated teams) covers that use case better than any prototype-specific tool.
Framer — For Web-Focused Teams Moving Off InVision
Teams that used InVision primarily for sharing mockups of marketing sites and web pages — rather than app UI screens — may find Framer a better fit than Figma. Framer is a design-to-publish tool for websites: you design and publish from the same environment, eliminating both the mockup-and-share step and the separate development step.
For agencies and marketing teams whose InVision prototypes were mostly of websites rather than product UIs, Framer compresses the workflow significantly.
Framer pricing:
- Free: framer.site subdomain
- Mini: $5/month — custom domain
- Basic: $15/month — more pages, custom code
- Professional: $30/month — unlimited CMS, staging
Verdict: Framer is the right InVision alternative for web-focused design workflows. For product UI and app design, Figma or Penpot are better fits.
Zeplin — For Teams That Only Need Developer Handoff
Zeplin is a specialized developer handoff tool — not a design or prototype tool, but a structured way to share design specifications with developers. If your primary InVision use was the developer handoff and redline workflow rather than stakeholder prototype sharing, Zeplin fills that specific gap.
Zeplin works alongside Figma, Sketch, or any design tool — you export artboards from the design tool to Zeplin, which organizes them with CSS properties, measurements, and asset downloads.
Zeplin pricing:
- Free: 1 project
- Growing Business: $6/user/month
- Organization: $12/user/month — SSO, advanced permissions
Verdict: Zeplin is worth evaluating if your team’s InVision usage was primarily developer handoff and the design workflow will move to Figma (which has its own Dev Mode) but you prefer Zeplin’s handoff model. For teams consolidating onto Figma fully, Figma’s Dev Mode makes Zeplin redundant.
InVision Migration Guide
What to audit before migrating:
- Which InVision products you use: Prototype, Freehand, DSM, or Studio
- How many live prototypes need to be preserved or recreated
- Where your source design files live: Sketch, Photoshop, or image assets
- Who uses InVision: design team only, or external stakeholders with saved links
Realistic migration expectations:
- Click-through prototypes with hotspot links don’t transfer — they need to be rebuilt in the new tool
- Design files transfer if they’re in Sketch (import to Figma) or as image assets (import as images)
- Stakeholder comment threads in InVision don’t migrate — archive or screenshot important feedback before migration
- DSM design tokens need manual recreation in Figma Variables or a design token tool
Recommended migration path:
- Move source design files to Figma (via Sketch import or recreation)
- Rebuild prototype flows in Figma’s Prototype mode
- Update stakeholder links to new Figma share URLs
- Archive InVision comment history if needed
Which InVision Alternative Is Right for You?
| Your InVision use case | Best alternative |
|---|---|
| Full design + prototype + review workflow | Figma |
| Need free collaborative design + prototype | Penpot |
| Prototype sharing only, don’t want full design tool | Marvel |
| InVision Freehand whiteboard replacement | Miro |
| Web-focused design and publishing | Framer |
| Developer handoff only | Zeplin |
For most teams, the InVision migration destination is Figma — it absorbed InVision’s core value proposition while expanding it with collaborative design. The migration is worth doing promptly: InVision’s support and reliability will only decrease from here.