6 Best PlanetScale Alternatives in 2026 (After the Hobby Tier Shutdown)

Disclosure: This article contains affiliate links. We may earn a commission if you sign up through one of our links, at no extra cost to you.

TL;DR: For most developers who relied on PlanetScale’s Hobby tier: [Neon]([AFFILIATE_LINK_PENDING: neon]) is the closest replacement — serverless Postgres with branching, a free tier, and a familiar developer workflow. For a full backend platform: [Supabase]([AFFILIATE_LINK_PENDING: supabase]). For edge/low-latency SQLite deployments: [Turso]([AFFILIATE_LINK_PENDING: turso]).

---

Why Developers Are Leaving PlanetScale

PlanetScale was the serverless MySQL the dev community rallied around between 2021 and 2023. The branching workflow — create a database branch per PR, merge schema changes without migration anxiety — was genuinely novel. The free Hobby tier let indie developers and early-stage startups run real workloads without a credit card.

In April 2024, PlanetScale shut down the Hobby tier without a grace period or grandfathered pricing. The new floor is $39/month (Scaler plan). For developers running side projects and early-stage apps, that’s a meaningful cost jump from zero.

The reasons PlanetScale gave make business sense: production-grade infrastructure is expensive, and the free tier was heavily used by accounts that would never convert to paid. That doesn’t make the migration easier.

The wrinkle: PlanetScale uses Vitess under the hood — MySQL-compatible but with specific limitations (no foreign key constraints by default, specific schema change workflow). Moving a PlanetScale app means choosing a new database engine and in some cases rewriting queries.

Here are the six best alternatives, matched to the specific reasons you might have chosen PlanetScale.

---

PlanetScale Alternatives at a Glance

Platform	Database type	Free tier	Paid entry	Branching	Best for
Neon	Serverless Postgres	0.5 GB, compute-on-demand	$19/mo	Yes	Branch-per-PR workflow
Turso	SQLite (libSQL)	3 DBs, 500 reads/day	$29/mo	No	Edge/low-latency workloads
Supabase	Postgres	500 MB, 2 projects	$25/mo	No	Full backend platform
Xata	Postgres-compatible	15 GB, 15 DBs	$20/mo	Yes	Spreadsheet-style database UX
CockroachDB Serverless	Distributed Postgres	5 GB, 50M RU/mo	Usage-based	No	Multi-region distributed apps
Nile	Postgres (tenant-aware)	Free preview	TBD	No	Multi-tenant SaaS

---

Neon — Best Serverless Postgres for Branching Workflows

If you chose PlanetScale specifically for branching, Neon is the most direct equivalent in the Postgres ecosystem.

What Neon does:

• Serverless Postgres — compute scales to zero when idle, spins up in milliseconds on request
• Database branching — create a branch from main, make schema changes, test, and merge back without locking production
• Logical replication support for CDC pipelines
• Point-in-time restore on paid plans

Neon free tier:

• 0.5 GB storage
• 1 project, up to 10 databases
• Branching included
• Compute scales to zero (no charge while idle)

Neon pricing:

• Free: as above
• Launch: $19/month (10 GB storage, 300 compute hours, unlimited branches)
• Scale: $69/month (50 GB, 750 compute hours, more projects)

Migration from PlanetScale: PlanetScale is MySQL; Neon is Postgres. This is not a trivial schema migration. Tools like pgloader handle MySQL-to-Postgres data migration, but expect to audit queries for MySQL-specific syntax. If your ORM abstracts the database layer (Prisma, Drizzle), compatibility is higher.

Who it’s for: Developers who valued PlanetScale’s branching-per-PR workflow and want a Postgres equivalent with the same development loop. [Start free on Neon →][AFFILIATE_LINK_PENDING: neon]

---

Turso — Best Embedded SQLite for Edge and Low-Latency Deployments

Turso is the most different alternative on this list. It’s not MySQL or Postgres — it’s SQLite distributed to the edge via libSQL, an open-source SQLite fork maintained by the Turso team.

What Turso does:

• Deploy your database to 35+ edge locations globally
• Read latencies in single-digit milliseconds for geographically distributed users
• Embedded replicas: SQLite file on your server syncs automatically from Turso cloud
• Works with any SQLite-compatible client or ORM (Drizzle, Prisma via adapter)

Turso free tier:

• 3 databases
• 500 row reads/day, 25 writes/day
• 1 GB total storage

Turso pricing:

• Starter: $29/month (500 databases, 1 billion reads, 25M writes, 25 GB)
• Scaler: $199/month (unlimited databases)

Migration from PlanetScale: Turso uses SQLite, not MySQL. Migration requires moving data to SQLite format and validating query compatibility. Best suited to new projects or apps with straightforward data access patterns.

Who it’s for: Developers building edge-deployed apps (Cloudflare Workers, Vercel Edge Functions, Fly.io), per-user database isolation use cases (one SQLite per tenant), or SQLite-native projects that need cloud sync. [Try Turso →][AFFILIATE_LINK_PENDING: turso]

---

Supabase — Best If You Need a Full Backend Platform

Supabase is Postgres plus auth, object storage, realtime subscriptions, and edge functions in one open-source platform. It’s more than a database, but if you were using PlanetScale alongside Firebase, Auth0, or S3, Supabase may consolidate several services into one.

For a detailed comparison of Supabase as a backend platform versus Firebase, see our Supabase vs Firebase comparison.

What Supabase includes:

• Fully managed PostgreSQL
• Auth (email/password, OAuth providers, magic links, SSO on Enterprise)
• Real-time subscriptions via Postgres logical replication
• Storage (S3-compatible object storage)
• Edge Functions (Deno-based serverless compute)
• Row-level security via native Postgres RLS

Supabase free tier:

• 500 MB database, 5 GB bandwidth
• 50,000 monthly active users (auth)
• 2 active projects
• Important limitation: Projects pause after 1 week of inactivity on the free tier

Supabase pricing:

• Pro: $25/month (8 GB storage, no pausing, daily backups, 7-day PITR)
• Team: $599/month (HIPAA, SSO, 28-day PITR)

Migration from PlanetScale: Postgres-targeted migration with pgloader for data. Supabase also provides migration tooling. If you’re consolidating auth, storage, and database from multiple services, the migration scope may be lower than it appears — you’re replacing more than just PlanetScale.

Who it’s for: Teams wanting a full backend platform on open-source infrastructure. Great for startups building on Postgres who don’t want to manage auth, storage, and realtime separately. [Start with Supabase →][AFFILIATE_LINK_PENDING: supabase]

---

Xata — Best for Spreadsheet-Style Database UX

Xata is a Postgres-compatible serverless database with a distinct angle: a UI that feels closer to Airtable or Notion than a SQL admin panel. It also has native branching.

What Xata does:

• Serverless Postgres with a visual record editor
• Database branching (per-PR workflow, similar to Neon)
• Built-in full-text search without a separate Elasticsearch instance
• File storage included in the platform
• TypeScript SDK with type inference from schema

Xata free tier:

• 15 GB total storage (database + search + files)
• 15 databases, 25 branches per database

Xata pricing:

• Pro: $20/month (custom data regions, higher limits, no free-tier restrictions on branches)

Who it’s for: Small teams and non-SQL-native developers who want database branching plus a visual record editor for managing data. Verify [Xata’s]([AFFILIATE_LINK_PENDING: xata]) affiliate program status before the engineer wires affiliate links.

---

CockroachDB Serverless — Best for Multi-Region Distributed Workloads

CockroachDB is distributed SQL — Postgres-wire-compatible, designed for high availability and multi-region consistency. The Serverless tier makes it accessible without infrastructure operations.

What CockroachDB Serverless does:

• Postgres-wire-compatible (most Postgres clients and ORMs work without changes)
• Distributed across multiple regions automatically
• Serializable isolation — strongest consistency guarantee available
• Scales horizontally without manual sharding

CockroachDB free tier:

• 5 GB storage
• 50 million Request Units per month (enough for real early-stage workloads)

CockroachDB pricing:

• Serverless above free: $0.20 per million RUs, $0.50 per GB storage
• Dedicated: from $295/month

Migration from PlanetScale: CockroachDB is Postgres-wire-compatible, so once you’ve completed the MySQL → Postgres data migration, CockroachDB requires minimal additional changes. ORM compatibility is high.

Who it’s for: Teams building globally-distributed applications that need low latency across regions, or apps with strong consistency requirements across distributed nodes. Not the first choice for simple single-region apps where Neon or Supabase are simpler.

---

Which PlanetScale Alternative Should You Choose?

Your situation	Best choice
You used PlanetScale for database branching	[Neon]([AFFILIATE_LINK_PENDING: neon]) — closest branching equivalent in Postgres
You need a complete backend (auth, storage, realtime)	[Supabase]([AFFILIATE_LINK_PENDING: supabase]) — platform, not just a database
You’re deploying to the edge with low-latency needs	[Turso]([AFFILIATE_LINK_PENDING: turso]) — SQLite at the edge
You want a visual record editor plus branching	[Xata]([AFFILIATE_LINK_PENDING: xata]) — best UX for non-SQL-native teams
You’re building multi-region with strong consistency	CockroachDB Serverless — distributed Postgres

For most developers coming off PlanetScale’s Hobby tier, [Neon]([AFFILIATE_LINK_PENDING: neon]) is the answer: it’s the most direct replacement for the branching-per-PR workflow, has a functional free tier, and runs on Postgres — which gives you the broadest compatibility with ORMs, deployment platforms, and tooling.

If you need auth, storage, and realtime alongside your database, [Supabase]([AFFILIATE_LINK_PENDING: supabase]) is worth the broader platform commitment. Both have generous enough free tiers to build and ship a real app before paying.

---

PlanetScale Alternatives: Developer Community Feedback

The migration from PlanetScale generated substantial community discussion. Here’s what developers reported after switching:

Neon migration feedback: The most common praise is the branching UX — developers on the Neon Discord and r/webdev report that the branch-per-PR workflow translates almost 1:1 from PlanetScale once you switch to Postgres connection strings. The most common complaint is cold start latency on the free tier for projects that see infrequent traffic (the database suspends after inactivity periods).

Turso migration feedback: Developers running edge functions (Cloudflare Workers, Vercel Edge Runtime) report significant latency improvements over centralized Postgres databases. The 500-database free tier is the most frequently praised feature — multi-tenant apps with one database per customer become economically viable at a scale that would cost thousands on managed RDS.

Supabase migration feedback: Teams that were using PlanetScale alongside a separate auth service (Auth0, Clerk) frequently report that Supabase reduced their third-party service count. The consolidation saves $50–200/month across auth and storage subscriptions for many teams.

Common migration regret: PlanetScale’s Vitess-powered horizontal sharding is genuinely difficult to replicate. Teams that were using PlanetScale specifically for high-throughput write scaling at the database layer (not just the developer experience features) found that Neon, Turso, and Supabase don’t offer equivalent write scaling without moving to CockroachDB or managed distributed Postgres solutions costing significantly more.

If your PlanetScale usage was primarily for the developer experience (branching, serverless connection pooling, schema change workflows) rather than horizontal write scaling, any of the alternatives in this list will serve you well. If you were scaling writes horizontally via Vitess sharding, your migration path is more complex and likely involves CockroachDB or a managed Postgres cluster with pgBouncer — a different budget and infrastructure commitment.